Home » About Us » Blog » Duped: A Nation of Eaters

    Duped: A Nation of Eaters

    February 4, 2009 •  5 comments.

     •  Blog, Uncategorized

    We are a nation of 300 million eaters.

    And anyone that eats can attest to the utter confusion that our food supply has become. As headlines swirl about beef recalls large enough to feed every American two hamburgers, baby formula laced with melamine, and controversial additives used to preserve processed foods, eaters can’t help but yearn for the days when all we had to worry about was contaminated spinach.

    To be candid, I was never much of a foodie. When I heard about Michael Pollan’s PBS Interview with Bill Moyers, I couldn’t relate when he said that his “path was through the garden“. My path was through the aisles at Costco and the tubes of blue yogurt, since I saw the organic thing as a lifestyle choice that I couldn’t afford.

    But as 2008 headlines exposed our tainted financial system, stories followed about our tainted food supply. As I read about baby formulas and jars of salsa laced with who-knows-what, I was left slack-jawed as I learned that the financial industry wasn’t the only industry that had experienced deregulation, lack of transparency and failed oversight.

    In the last eight years, the Food and Drug Administration, charged with safeguarding the health of our nation’s 300 million eaters, has not only seen its budget decline but has also seen its staffing levels fall behind its workload.

    From 2003 to 2006, the number of food safety inspections conducted by the agency dropped by 47 percent, leading its own Science Board, chaired by Barbara McNeil, M.D., Ph.D., head of the Department of Health Policy at Harvard Medical School and a radiologist at the Brigham and Women’s in Boston, to declare that the agency could “no longer fulfill its mission without substantial and sustained additional appropriations.”

    In “an alarming report,” the New York Times stated that the FDA had also declared that “American lives at risk” and that the FDA lacks resources and “can no longer ensure the safety of the food supply.”

    And I thought all I had to worry about was the declining stock market and sick kids.

    As I dug into additional research from organizations like the Cato Institute, the Environmental Working Group and the Royal Society of Chemistry, I learned that a lot of the scientific data highlighted in the press has been funded by the food industry and propagated by groups with legitimate sounding names like the American Council on Science and Health. I also learned that in the last ten years, our food supply had been chemically engineered in order to enhance product shelf life, productivity and profitability of food corporations.

    According to the United States Department of Agriculture, the United States is the world’s largest corporate producer of genetically engineered organisms. Since the introduction of these bio-engineered ingredients into our food just over ten years ago, we are also one of the only developed countries allowing these ingredients into our food supply (stats from USDA/ERS: Rapid growth of adoption of genetically engineered crops continues in the US).

    As I continued to learn more from the Food and Drug Administration, the US Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency, I also learned that no human trials had been conducted to assess the safety of consuming these genetically modified and bio-engineered foods, prompting government agencies around the world – from Europe to Russia to Australia – to either ban or label these ingredients due to the health risks that they may present.

    Through documentaries like The Future of Food and a May 2008 Vanity Fair investigative story , which detail the remarkable relationship that the agrichemical, food corporations have with our government, I learned about a “revolving door” that exists between the food industry and our government agencies. Candidly, the stories read much like a James Bond movie or George Clooney’s Michael Clayton and reminded me of a recent New York Times piece titled “The Guys From Government Sachs” about the “revolving door” between the investment banking industry and our government.

    As I struggled to reconcile what I was learning about these corporations, their profit-driven strategies, our government and the global food crisis, I was fascinated by an article by Michael Pollan, “Playing God in the Garden” and a recent Catholic News document from the Vatican stating that “the responsibility for the food crisis “is in the hands of unscrupulous people who focus only on profit and certainly not on the well-being of all people. If one wants to pursue GMOs (genetically modified organisms) one can freely do so, but without hiding that it’s a way to make more profits” given that “a more just system of distribution and not the manufacturing of genetically modified foods is the key to addressing the problem.”

    According to the Wall Street Journal‘s Money and Investing section, one of these corporations has recently seen their stock price rise 170 percent.

    As the Vatican cries “moral foul”, is this a signal that there’s more fire than smoke on the horizon? We will have to wait and see.

    In the meantime, I may listen to a few earnings’ calls as evidence continues to mount regarding health risks like infertility that these bio-engineered foods present. I may also clean out my cabinets in an effort to reduce my family’s exposure to these genetically engineered organisms now found in conventional corn, soy and milk in the United States.

    And as I do, I will reflect on the headlines of 2008, The Audacity of Greed, and the impact that the corporations, lobbyists and bankers spinning through the “revolving door” have on our policy decisions, while the theme song from Donald Trump’s TV show, The Apprentice, runs through my head:

    “Money, Money, Money, Mon-ey, MON-EY!”

    To learn more about Food Politics, please visit: www.foodpolitics.com, FOOD POLITICS at www.allergykids.com, or the Environmental Working Group at www.ewg.org

      5 Responses to “Duped: A Nation of Eaters”

      1. Best summary I have seen in a long time. Congratulations!

        May your article not end up “as one shouting in the dessert”

        Best wishes

      2. I came face to face with the secrecy behind “nutraceuticals” last week when my son had an allergic reaction to a “Heart Healthy” plant sterol in his rice milk. Sure we missed the “Heart Healthy” insignia on the carton but there was no fine-print on the origins of the “plant sterol.” When I called the “Corowise” representative (a subsidiary of Cargill) they wouldn’t reveal the source on the phone and re-directed me to the rice milk comparny. Long story short – the plant sterol in question was derived from soybeans and my son has a life threatening food allergy to soy. Thankfully, he had very little and his reaction was relatively “mild.” He is six.

      3. Great post.

        Its funny that these greedy corporate leaders who are driven towards amassing tonnes of money are mostly interested in building their legacies. Who had the largest home, who wielded the most power, who had the largest plaque on the wall of the art gallery/ charity/ museum. . . . .

        Does history remember wealth? Maybe, but not as much as strong ideas. Most of these fools spend so much time figuring out how to squeeze another penny out of a market that they’ve wasted their lives producing nothing significant to history whatsoever.

        History also remembers evil. Will people of the future remember how many yachts you had or how many species you destroyed?

        Look to the poor for true inspiration.

      4. Jenny Martin

        I’m happy to have found your blog! I’ve also been following the website http://www.westonaprice.org

      Leave a Reply